One Million Market Beaters

Uncertainty remains, but Florida is in the cross hairs.
What to expect today after tornado outbreak.
Why we’re watching Gaston closely now.

These headlines were pulled from a few articles today at You could seamlessly replace Florida, tornado, and Gaston with a stock because like the weather, markets are highly complex with countless variables that can’t fully be modeled.

In his highly entertaining book, But What If We’re Wrong, Chuck Klosterman talks about how much money has been spent trying to predict the weather:

Somebody once told me a joke about meteorology. The premise is that we’ve been trying to predict the weather since 3000 BC. The yearly budget for the National Weather Service is $1 billion…Even a conservative estimate places the annual amount of money spent on meteorology at somewhere around $5 billion. And as a result of this investment, our weather can be correctly predicted around 66 percent of the time. As a society, we can go two out of three. Yet if some random dude simply says, “I think the weather tomorrow will be the same as the weather today,” he will be right 33 percent of the time. He can go one for three. So we’ve invested hundreds of billions of dollars and countless hours into meteorological research, with the net effect of becoming twice as accurate as some bozo who looks out the window and points at the sky.

The Wall Street Journal just reported that U.S. mutual funds spend more than $300 million every year to send investors written reports. This is an astonishingly large number, but it’s peanuts compared to how much they spend trying to beat their benchmark. And while the net effect of becoming twice as accurate as some bozo might be true with the weather, it’s the opposite with investing.

The chart below from Dimensional Funds shows that all a bozo has to do to beat the majority of professionals is buy an index fund.

index dimensional


There are a number of explanations as to why funds underperform, from high-fees to tax inefficiencies to the high level of competition and so on. But the simplest explanation as to why so many mutual funds fail to beat an index is because so many stocks fail to beat the index.

J.P. Morgan and Longboard Asset management both have done great work on how difficult stock picking is. Below are some of their findings.

  1. 25% of stocks accounted for all of the markets’ gain.
  2. 40% of all stocks suffer a catastrophic loss (70%) and never fully recover.
  3. The median stock underperformed the market with an excess lifetime return of -54%
  4. Two-thirds of all stocks underperform the market.
  5. 40% of all stocks have negative total returns.
  6. 18.6% of all stocks dramatically underperform the market.
  7. 53% of all technology stocks have had negative returns.
  8. Since 1980, over 320 stocks were removed from the S&P 500 due to distress.
  9. Evert sector had  a negative median excess return versus the market.
  10. Only 6.1% of stocks dramatically outperformed the market during their lifetime.

In 2015, there were 99 million global stock trades a day to the tune of $498 billion. That’s a lot of people who all share the same goal of buying stocks that are going to outperform. I know we all think statistics don’t imply to us, but they really do. According to a 2013 Deloitte study, 17 million Americans in the United States have a brokerage account. If just 5.9% of these 17 million beat the market, some lucky and some skilled, that’s 1,000,000 people. Chances are you know one of these people and think if they can do it, so can I. And you’d be right, you can do it, but the odds aren’t in your favor.


But What If We’re Wrong? Thinking About the Present As If It Were the Past

J.P. Morgan: The Agony & The Ecstasy 

The Capitalism Distribution

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.