One Final Puff

There are half as many listed U.S. companies as there were twenty years ago, which is a topic that’s been widely covered this year. (Barron’s, Wall Street JournalBloomberg, MarketWatch). I thought this topic was pretty much beaten into the ground until came across an excellent piece from Vanguard.

Small IPOs have crashed thanks to tighter regulations, the scrutiny young public companies face, and most importantly, a burgeoning private market. Here’s Vanguard on IPOs over the last four decades (emphasis mine):

Figure 2 shows the number of IPOs according to company size. Smaller firms, defined as those with gross IPO proceeds under $100 million—which essentially makes them micro-cap companies—fell precipitously following the tech bubble. The disappearance of small- and micro-firm IPOs was the main reason the total number of stocks declined between 1996 and 2016

The chart below shows what happens to stocks three years following their IPO. Here’s Vanguard, again, emphasis mine.

Even after going public via an IPO, most companies remain small relative to other publicly listed companies. Figure 4a shows that only a very small percentage of companies grow to become small-, mid-, or large-cap. The overwhelming majority of companies either remain micro-cap or delist.

The total number of micro-caps has been in decline since the end of the dot com bubble, however, figure 6b shows that micro-caps’ proportion of the overall market has been quite stable, at around 1.5% of total U.S. market capitalization.

There are less tiny companies going public than there used to, and that’s really all there is to it. I don’t see this as a positive or negative story, just an interesting set of data that can now, thanks to Vanguard, be put to rest.

Source:

What’s behind the falling number of public companies?

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.