At First Glance

Some things look really impressive at first glance. Walking on burning wood is a perfect example, which John Allen Paulos writes about Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences:

The practice has often been cited as an example of “mind over matter” and you don’t have to be innumerate to be impressed initially with such a feat. What makes this phenomenon less remarkable is the relatively little-known fact that dehydrated wood has an extremely low heat content and very poor heat conductivity. Just as it’s possible to put your hand into a hot oven without burning yourself as long as you don’t touch the metal oven racks, a person can walk quickly across burning wood coals without any serious harm to his feet. Of course, quasi-religious talk about mind control is more appealing than a discussion of heat content and conductivity.

Numbers can be misleading because we tend to take them at face value. They provide information ten times faster than context and nuance. Take a look at the statistics and you’ll conclude that Walt Bellamy was one of the greatest basketball players ever. He’s one of just nine players in the 20,000 points and 14,000 rebounds club. The other 8 are Kareem, Karl Malone, Shaq, Moses Malone, Elvin Hayes, Tim Duncan, Garnett, and Robert Parish. So quite the body of work, right? Well, yea, sort of. In the Bill Simmons Book of Basketball, he throws some cold water on his greatness, writing:

He averaged a 29-17 during his first three seasons–1961-1963, before the league got bigger…and never made another all-star team after ’64….His teams never won–in fact, Bellamy’s teams won just two playoff series and dealt him twice in his prime…The great George Kiseda even wrote, “Walt Bellamy is the skeleton in the closet of the 20,000 point club.”

Finance can be a tricky place to navigate when armed with the requisite information. At first glance it’s a minefield. How much would you invest in a fund that compounded at 13.9% annually over twenty years when the S&P 500 did 9.2% over the same period? I know you would be careful, but the average investor who doesn’t read this blog would be very excited by these numbers. This fund that destroyed for two decades got destroyed shortly thereafter. Over the next four years, it would lose 43% of its value. Well, surely stocks must have had a rough time too right? Wrong. The S&P 500 grew 57% over the same time. I’m talking about John Paulson’s fund, which looked amazing at first glance. In the nine years since the GFC, Paulson is down 21%. The S&p 500 is up 259%.

I’m not saying people could have known that Paulson would suffer a lost decade after The Greatest Trade Ever, but really, how often do once in a lifetime trades happen? If you ever felt a visceral reaction to something in the world of finance, take a second to slow down. Even facts can be misleading.


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.