Unified American Discourse

Besides the NBA China story, the Joker hot takes, Trump tweeting about the #donothingdemocrats, the outrage over a #cancelWWEnetwork match, and the venture capitalists butting heads with Scott Galloway, it was a fairly quiet weekend.

How did this happen?

When I first joined Twitter in November, 2009, it was mostly to follow Knicks and Giants beat writers. Shortly thereafter I found the finance vertical. My introduction into this new world began with StockTwits and Blodget and Weisenthal and TRB.

Twitter started in 2006, but our little sandbox exploded with users in late 2008 and all throughout 2009 as you can see in the chart below*.

The financial world was in free fall and people went searching for answers. On Twitter, they found a community of reporters, traders, fake traders, financial advisors, and investment bankers. Insiders and outsiders and everything in between. We asked questions and shared stories and made jokes and it was fun and exciting and new. But that was ten years ago and as Dorothy said to Toto, “I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.”

In Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death, he wrote about the consequences of electricity finding its way into communication (emphasis mine):

His telegraph erased state lines, collapsed regions, and, by wrapping the continent in an information grid, created the possibility of a unified American discourse. But at a considerable cost. For telegraphy did something that Morse did not foresee when he prophesied that telegraphy would make “one neighborhood of the whole country.” It destroyed the prevailing definition of information, and in doing so gave a new meaning to public discourse. Among the few who understood this consequence was Henry David Thoreau, who remarked in Walden that “We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate…Thoreau, as it turned out, was precisely correct. He grasped that the telegraph would create its own definition of discourse; that it would not only permit but insist upon a conversation between Maine and Texas.

We’ve always been defined by our differences; different races, cultures, religions, and of course viewpoints. That’s what makes our country special. But before social media, the differences were often simmering in the background, occasionally exploding to the surface. But Twitter has killed the simmer, leaving only daily explosions. Morgan Housel wrote about this in a recent post:

TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington recently wrote: “I thought Twitter was driving us apart, but I’m slowly starting to think half of you always hated the other half but never knew it until Twitter.” This is a good point that highlights something easy to overlook: 1) everyone belongs to a tribe, 2) those tribes sometimes fundamentally disagree with one another, 3) that’s fine if those tribes keep their distance, 4) the internet increasingly assures that they don’t.

There is no going back. This is now the world we live in, and you have two choices, complain, or adapt. Full disclosure, I complain.

We can’t control how noisy the universe is, but we can decide how to listen. The best way to lower the volume on your feed is to get rid of the accounts that are bothering you. “This is exactly what causes groupthink.” Stop it. I follow plenty of people who’s views I disagree with, but I don’t follow people I disagree with who are jerks. Ugh, and now I’m defending myself against nobody in particular. I thought blogs were a safe space.

For all its flaws, Twitter is still a great place to ask questions and find answers.

*This post started as something very different than this. Sorry for anyone I left out. Find the list Twitter Accounts

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.