Stock-Picking Struggles

The Wall Street Journal recently ran two articles about the struggles of stock-picking hedge fund managers. Last week covered Jeffrey Vinik who is shutting down his fund just eight months after starting it, and today’s story covered the twilight of the stock pickers.

There are legitimate reasons that stock pickers have struggled; from low interest rates to growth over value and mega cap over everything else, but this is losing the forest for the trees. I think what happened here is very straight-forward and there is no need to over complicate it. Simply put, there is too much competition.

The Journal states that there were 530 hedge funds in 1990 managing $39 billion. Today there are more than 8,200 responsible for $3.2 trillion in investable assets.

Here’s an analogy, if you will:

The roads used to be much less efficient. Not everybody carried a map and not everybody knew how to read one. Those that did had the ability to go a different way. But today you hit traffic and everybody opens their phone and receives the same instructions. So when you get off the highway there are 20 cars in front of you and 20 behind. The roads, like markets, have become more efficient.

Hedge funds are an exclusive group of investors. These people were trained at the same schools and then at the same firms and then on the same strategies. They’re all following the same directions.

A lot of the headwinds on stock picking will eventually dampen and they will once again look like the very smart, highly trained investors that they are. And this can’t come soon enough, because the competition is a headwind I don’t think will ever reverse.


Billionaire Stock Picker Jeffrey Vinik to Shut Down Hedge Fund

Twilight of the Stock Pickers: Hedge Fund Kings Face a Reckoning 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.