Levered Long

A listener asked abut replicating some sort of risk parity strategy using levered ETFs. Back in the day, you had to use futures or options in order to magnify your returns, but today there are ETFs that allow you to implement this idea very easily.

I had Nick Maggiulli run some numbers for me on what a 60/40 levered portfolio would have done compared to the unlevered version. We used two funds for this analysis, both from Direxion. SPXL (Daily S&P 500 3X Bull) and TYD (Daily 7-10 Year US Treasury 3x Bull). Prior to 2009, we used SPY and IEF and multiplied each daily return by three times, like the levered ETFs do.

One of the first things to consider before even thinking about this type of strategy is that it requires frequent rebalancing. This is not a set it and forget it type of model. The chart below shows that the composition of the original 60/40 portfolio varies wildly. Near the stock market bottom in 2009, bonds were almost 90% of the portfolio!

In order to prevent this from happening, I had Nick run a rebalance every time stocks or bonds got more than 5% away from their original allocation, on either side. In other words, any time stocks or bonds were +/- 5% from 60 or 40, a rebalance would occur. The median rebalancing time is just 18 days, and there were almost 100 rebalances over the last 15 years. Like I said, this thing requires your full attention.

But at least your efforts would have been rewarded. From 2005 to today, it compounded at 14% annually, compared to 8% for the unlevered version.

The key to capitalizing on these outsized returns was the rebalancing. Without it, you barely beat the unlevered version.

But there is a catch. Without rebalancing, the levered portfolio had a drawdown that was twice as deep as the unlevered version. So similar returns with a way less attractive risk profile. Hard pass.

Back to the strategy that kicked butt. The key to outsized returns was the rebalancing, which was a constant occurrence as stocks were crashing in 2008 and 2009 (If you’d like you can scroll up a few charts to see what I’m talking about). This drove returns later, but it would have been basically impossible for a human to implement in real time. It lost 16.5% on a single day, and fell 10% in a day on 7 other occasions. Peak-to-trough, it experienced a 70+% decline. Be real, you probably would have bailed or at least given up on rebalancing.

Stocks and bonds both have positive expected returns, so I understand why a young person with a high risk tolerance would find this appealing. But after looking at the numbers, it probably doesn’t make sense to do it with your entire portfolio, if at all. It requires constant monitoring, and an iron stomach. Leverage can turbo charge your returns, but it can also wipe them out if you’re not careful.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.