The Most Lopsided Days

The leaders have been powering this market higher for a long time. The distance between the generals and the soldiers, once thought to portend a market top, is as wide as it has ever been.

Market participants have been having the same discussion for the last 5 years.

 

At this point any chatter about lousy breadth sounds like boy who cried wolf talk, so please forgive me for going there again, because what happened last week is truly remarkable.

Jonathan Krinsky wrote:

The Nasdaq Composite (CCMP) closed up 1.49%, while the Nasdaq A/D line was -971. To put that in perspective, since 2004 (as far back as we have data) there has only been one other day where the CCMP was up at least 1.49%, and there were more decliners than advancers. That was 4/16/20 which was +1.66% with the A/D line -319.

Looking at it the other way, there have been 645 days since 2004 when the CCMP had at least 971 net decliners. Prior to Friday, the best performance for the CCMP on those days was +0.67% (6/10/20). The second best day was +0.53% on 7/9/20. Put another way, the top three most lopsided breadth/performance days in the last 16 years have come in the last 7 weeks.

So, the question you might be asking is, does any of this matter? Paradoxically, this was more concerning on the way up than it is today. What I mean is, now that the big five are such a large percentage of the market, it hardly matters what the rest of the stocks are doing. For example, Krinsky notes that the top three names in the NASDAQ-100, Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft, are equal to the bottom 87 stocks in the index.

I’ll give Jonathan the last word here.

So until and unless some of the mega-cap tech names begin to breakdown a bit, it’s difficult to call a top and breadth divergences are less and less meaningful.

Source:

Baycrest Partners

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.