Some thoughts on CryptoPunks

If you’re reading this post, you’ve almost surely heard about CryptoPunks, the most expensive Non-Fungible Token in all the land. This week, they went mainstream, with the announcement that Visa spent $150,000 on CryptoPunk #7610.

Larva Labs, CryptoPunk #7610 (2017). Courtesy of Visa, via Twitter.The first time I tweeted about these little pixelated characters, probably when I first learned of them, was back in February of 2021. At the time, the floor price was 18.4 ETH, or $36,000.

Crazy, right?

Well, fast forward to today, and the cheapest one available is 92 ETH, or a cool $297,000!!

What’s wild about all this, and there’s a lot, is that there are 10,000 of these, but only 1,123 up for sale. So, when given the opportunity to sell a JPEG for 300 grand, nearly 90% of collectors said, “no thanks.”

The conviction here is truly something to behold.

Is this a bubble? You might think the answer is an obvious yes, given that the volume on OpenSea was under $100 million in May, and it’s over $2 billion so far in August.

30 minutes ago CrytpoPunk 6947 sold for $645k. Another one went for $873k an hour ago. So yeah, understandably, you probably think this is a bubble. But ask yourself, is “everyone” you know talking about CryptoPunks? What would your spouse say if you asked him or her what they thought about them? What would your friends say? They probably would say “What the hell is a CryptoPunk?”

Combine this with the fact that 90% of collectors are refusing to sell, despite an offer of $300k and the prices might stay higher for longer than we think.

If I were able to bet on the market cap of NFTs collectively falling by 50%, I’d surely take that bet, but I wouldn’t underestimate the community aspect of certain projects. There’s something special going on here, clearly, and nobody wants to be the person that breaks the ice and lists below the current floor price. Once that happens, and again I’d bet that it will in most of these projects, then the speed at which prices decline will be breathtaking.

Another aspect to consider here is, as I’ve mentioned before, is that ETH are chips in a casino.

A few weeks ago I was playing craps and had hundreds of dollars spread all over the table. If I was using paper currency to place my bets, there’s no way I’d behave that way. Most of us see $310k and literally cannot process this. But the buyers don’t see the dollars. They see the ETH. And according to to data from Glassnode, there are 6,400 addresses that hold more than 1,000 ETH. So why wouldn’t they spend 100 ETH on something that gives them social status and other non-quantifiable benefits?

Here’s my final thought that I think is really important. You, me, everybody probably had the same reaction when they first learned about CryptoPunks:

“Wait. Is this a joke? People are paying tens of thousands of dollars for this? Can’t I just take a screen shot? I don’t get it.”

That’s a perfectly normal reaction. Like I said, that’s how I first responded. But when it comes to new ideas, a healthier attitude, a more profitable attitude*, is healthy curiosity rather than downright skepticism. Now I understand that most people are born with a certain disposition. We are who we are. But I think we should all strive to be a little more open minded when it comes to things we don’t understand.

This is more of a general observation and less of a “go out and buy JPEGs and you too can get rich.”

Have a nice weekend. See you on OpenSea 😃

*There’s a whole other post about being curious versus being a skeptic. I shouldn’t even write “versus” because it’s not one or the other. You can curious about certain things and skeptical about others.  


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.