Comparing Two Blowups

I keep coming back to this theme that things feel a lot worse than what’s revealed by looking at how far the S&P 500 is from its all-time high. One of the primary reasons, and there are several, is the number of stocks absolutely blowing up. The names coming undone were the darlings of the pandemic, and so we’re particularly sensitive to their unraveling. And the speed at which they’re doing it is breathtaking.

At the epicenter of this is the Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK), which peaked 306 days ago. Since then, it’s lost 70 cents on the dollar. The best comp we have for such a spectacular rise and fall is the dotcom bubble and bust. It’s hard to believe, but ARKKs 70% decline from the top is worse than what the Nasdaq 100 experienced over the same number of days from its high back in March 2000.

I won’t make a call as to whether ARKK will play out the same way, who knows, but here’s what the full picture looks like. The Nasdaq 100 would ultimately lose 82% of its value from peak to trough. As you know, the difference between down 60% and down 82% is not 22%. It would take the Nasdaq 100 another 327 days to bottom and would shed another 56% when all was said and done.

I don’t have fund flow data going back to the dotcom blowup, but it’s safe to assume that investors ran for the exits. So far, we’re seeing the opposite with ARKK. Investors are still piling in. Almost $1 billion in new money has come into the fund since the beginning of the year, according to Ben Johnson. Are these new investors thinking they’re buying on sale? Is it current investors doubling and tripling down?

Investors usually run from fires. This time they’re running towards it. Time will tell if they get rewarded or burned.


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.