Stocks Versus Bonds

The bond market is causing the stock market to rumble. Both 10 and 30-year treasuries are at the highest interest rates they’ve been at in over a decade.

Most investors allocate most of their portfolio to the two largest asset classes in the world; stocks and bonds. Overweighting one over the other for the last fifteen years was a relatively easy decision. You don’t need to be Harry Markowitz to know bonds yielding 2.5% are going to deliver…2.5%.

That decision is much less clear today than it was back then.

The simplest way to compare stocks to bonds is by taking the inverse of the price-to-earnings ratio, which gives you an earnings yield, and measuring it against real interest rates. Based on this simple calculation, stocks look fairly valued, some might even say rich, compared to bonds.

Investors make decisions based on this information, even if they’re not making calculations in a spreadsheet. They might say, “Hey, maybe I should lighten up on my stocks, considering I can get >5% on cash and >4% on bonds.”

The trillion-dollar question is, does this actually matter? Should investors be comparing stocks to bonds in this fashion? The answer is both yes, and no.

No, valuations don’t tell you anything about how stocks will perform over the short term. Stocks were expensive in 1996, 1997, etc. This chart shows you what happened over the next twelve months when stocks were at various levels versus bonds. There is no pattern here. Nothing at all.

Even going out three years, the chart looks the same, and the correlation is identical, .23 for each.

Valuations for publicly traded stocks are not like valuations for small, privately held businesses. Let’s say that you’re in the market for a laundromat with no intent to sell it. You just buy the business for the cash flows it generates.

Assume you find one that is kicking off $100,000 a year in net income. Multiples for laundromats are what they are. I’m making this up; let’s say it’s three times earnings. Alright, so you buy this for $300,000 cash, and assuming no growth, you’ll get paid back in three years, and then you’re off to the races.

But if you had a change of heart and decided you wanted to sell after two years, all else equal, it’s unlikely that somebody is going to come along and give you $700,000 for the same business that sold for $300,000 two years ago.

But this type of thing happens all the time in the stock market because animal spirits are a major factor. There are no greater fools in the laundromat industry. For a laundromat, what you pay is what it’s worth. In the stock market, prices change on a daily basis and are often disconnected from economic reality on the way up and on the way down, especially in the short term.

But over the long term, valuations absolutely matter because the reality is you are actually buying small pieces of a lot of companies.

The tricky part about investing based on valuations is they don’t matter over the short term, and few investors are making decisions today that they’re going to leave alone long enough for valuations to matter. I mean, ask yourself, is your current portfolio going to look the same in ten years as it does today? If so, did you dial back your U.S. large-cap equity exposure?

For the record, I’m not making any statements on whether you should or shouldn’t. I only ask the question to make you stop and think about the decisions you’re making and whether or not valuations enter them, and if they even should.

The bottom line is that valuations absolutely matter over the long term, but they won’t matter for you if the decisions you make are influenced over the short term.


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.