bubbles and BUBBLES

Technology moves the world forward. For the past decade, it’s done the same thing for the stock market.

A lot of time was spent debating if the Fed drove these stocks higher with low interest rates. Another theory is that investors are just chasing returns. And yet another is that index funds are making the big stocks even bigger. Bits and pieces of these theories may be true, but the simplest and best explanation as to why technology stocks have been the only game in town is because they’re the best businesses in the world. The shares of these tech giants have grown at a miraculous clip, but it’s hard to make the case that they didn’t earn it. They continue to drive massive growth on both the top and bottom lines.

Since 2015, big tech has bested the rest of the S&P 500 on their top line to an average tune of 12.5% a year. And they’re doing it with much higher margins.

The amount of value technology stocks have delivered compared to the rest of the business universe is staggering.

And yet, we still can’t help but wonder, will this end poorly? The images and stories of the dotcom bust are so ingrained in us that any rally led by tech stocks will inevitably get compared to that period in time.

Goldman put out a wonderful note, Why AI is Not a Bubble, from which I grabbed all these charts, where they compared these tech giants to the ones that crashed and burned. One can easily make the argument that these stocks, some more than others, are discounting a lot of growth. On the one hand, these stocks are not nearly as expensive based on 24-month forward P/E and E/V sales. During the dotcom bubble, both of those metrics are twice where they were today. On the other hand, and probably rightly so, these dominant tech stocks of today are almost three times larger than they were in 2000, once you adjust for inflation.

I say these companies are rightly bigger because their businesses are just so much better. 2000 was a lot more hype, hope, and promise. The return on equity and margins on these businesses are much higher than they were back then. And on a qualitative basis, Apple is so much more important to the consumer and the economy than Intel was. Amazon and Google are basically conglomerates; several businesses in one. They’re integral parts of our day-to-day lives in the way that Oracle never was or could be.

I feel like I’ve written a version of this post twice a year for the last five-plus years because they just keep on delivering. If you look at the data, it’s safe to say that today’s tech giants, by and large, have earned every bit of market cap they’ve accrued up until now. The question is, how long can this continue?

Since 2013, the Nasdaq-100 has had an average annual return of 21%, compounding at 19% a year.

It’s clear to everyone that the dotcom bubble was in fact a massive bubble. And while it’s less clear, to me at least, that these tech stocks are in a bubble, it’s hard to imagine the next decade looking as good as the last one. But then again, I would have said the same thing five years ago. As always, I would avoid making all-or-nothing bets, especially on such a large and polarizing area of the market.


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.