10 Reasons Why Stocks are More Dangerous than Sports

People are trading stocks like it’s 1999.

Between the quarantine lock-down, free trading commissions, and absence of sports to bet on, this is the perfect storm for brokerage accounts.

At first blush you might think that gambling on sports and gambling on stocks are no different, this was my knee-jerk reaction. And while there certainly are similarities, there are many more differences, and these differences would suggest, generally speaking, that betting on stocks is far more dangerous to your financial well-being for the following 1o reasons:

Stocks are Social, Sports are Isolating

The stock market is made up of companies whose products all of us use on a daily basis.

Not everyone knows who plays for the Lakers, but everyone knows who makes the iPhone.

Online communities are built around stocks for idea generation and camaraderie. Everybody wants to belong somewhere, and these neighborhoods tend to be welcoming, inspiring, and difficult to leave.

Betting on sports an isolating event. You’re typically on your couch, by yourself, glued to the screen. While you might get your ideas online, you’re not in front of the screen during a game the same way that you are for an earnings release.

The Rake

The reason why “the house always wins” in Vegas is because of how wide the spreads are. For example, let’s say the Lakers are playing the Knicks and the Lakers are favored to win by 11.5. Whichever side you take, it’s not even money. You’d have to bet $110 to win $100. If you’re winning at a 50% clip, after 100 games, you’re down 5%. Even if you’re winning at a 52% clip, you’d lose money. Win 58% of the time, which you’re not going to do, and you’re up just 9.7%.

Pay the house long enough and you realize you’re wasting your time.

With online brokerages, commissions are free and spreads are a penny wide. It’s not “rigged” the same way that sports are.

Efficient Markets

You see how efficient the betting market is in sports in a way that you don’t with stocks.

The lines are designed so that it makes it really hard to feel too confident one way or another. Let’s say that you want to pick the Lakers to win the game but not cover the spread, you would have to put up $700 just to win $100.

It doesn’t take long before you figure out that the odd makers are pretty good. You learn very quickly that “Vegas” is an incredibly difficult opponent. When you’re buying and selling stocks, you don’t see the person  hedge fund on the other side.

Dollars on the line

You would never in a million years bet $50,000 on a game, but people put $50,000 in their brokerage account like it’s nothing. Granted, you’re not going to lose $50,000 picking stocks in just three hours, but losing a large chunk of it over time is possible, if not likely.

With stocks, the game never ends, which often leads to the six most dangerous words in the investors quote book, “I’ll get out when I’m even.” This mentality hurts investors because as JP Morgan points out, 40% of all stocks have a catastrophic decline from which they never recover.

You might get out when you’re even, but it’s more likely that if you have this mentality you’ll get out at much lower prices.

Trading stocks requires risk management in a way that betting on sports does not.


Picking stocks doesn’t necessarily feel like gambling. Before pulling the trigger, you probably do some “research” like looking at a couple of numbers, or studying some charts.

You can’t control whether a catch is made or a shot goes in, but you can decide when to buy or sell. The game is played on your terms, which gives traders the illusion of control.


Everybody knows how much luck is involved with betting on games. Does anybody really think they’re a gifted sports handicapper? Who is the Warren Buffett of sports betting? Exactly.

The stock market on the other hand is full of successful people, and new investors might think mastering the market is just a matter of putting in 10,000 hours. Unfortunately, this rule does not apply here.

Cold Hard Cash

There is a reason why casinos use chips instead of cash. Losing $1,000 in hundreds hurts a lot more than losing $1,000 on a computer screen. (I’m assuming a bookie, or sports book).

Losing physical money is painful, and therefore you’re more likely to govern yourself when betting on a game than betting on a stock.

You know Apple isn’t going to zero, at least not in three hours, which makes you more comfortable using more money. Stating the obvious, losing 25% on $1,000 sets you back more than losing 100% of $100.


When you’re betting on sports, most times you don’t have access to leverage. The most you can lose is what you bet. And if your bookie does extend you leverage, you’re going to be careful because you could end up with some broken bones. It’s a lot easier to use margin from a faceless computer screen than it is from somebody who shows up at your door to collect.

I’m Gonna be Rich!

There are thousands of shady newsletters and scam artists preying an endless supply of noobwhales.

Granted, there are plenty of predators in sports betting, but the average person probably knows picking sports is a matter of luck while believing picking stocks is a matter of skill.

Your financial future

Trading stocks is not likely to be a profitable endeavor, and this is why betting on them can be so much more dangerous than betting on sports. Once new traders experience an ample amount of failure, they can go down two potential paths:

The first person sees the light. They realize that they’re betting against professionals who have more resources than they’ll ever have. They learn it’s a game not worth playing at all, and discover some sort of approach that doesn’t attempt to beat the market.

The second person never learns. They spend their entire life searching for an answer that doesn’t exist. They waste their retirement account contributions by trying to be the next Paul Tudor Jones. Learning a little bit about the stock market can be the most expensive decision they ever make.


When Josh asked me “What’s the difference between gambling on a game and gambling on a stock?”, my knee-jerk reaction to this question was “nothing. Gambling is gambling.” But that’s really not true. Gambling on stocks is way more dangerous for all the reasons I just mentioned.

Check out A Degenerate Gambler Walks into a Stock Exchange

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.