The Not-So-Magnificent 493

Five years ago, I wrote a blog post that would change the world of finance forever. I shared a chart that tried to visualize just how dominant the large stocks had gotten in the cap-weighted S&P 500.

In July 2018, with every FAAMG stock hitting an all-time high, these five companies had a market capitalization that was equal to the bottom 282 names in the index. A lot has changed between then and now, but one thing that hasn’t, or actually has, is how big the giants are relative to the rest of the market. These five names are now as big as the bottom 386 names in the index.

FAAMG picked up two more names along the way, Nvidia and Tesla, thereby making them the magnificent seven. These are seven of the eight biggest names in the S&P 500, with the exception of Berkshire Hathaway, which sits between Tesla and Meta. At a combined $11 trillion, they are as large as the 397 bottom names in the index.

The magnificent seven are now 28% of the market capitalization of the S&P 500.

Gigantic stocks are the outliers, yet they dominate the cap-weighted index. There are four times as many companies with a market cap between $10-$20 billion as there are companies with a market cap over $200 billion.

But the 31 stocks with a market cap over $200 billion are just about equal to the other 469 companies in the index.

Julian Klymochko tweeted that Apple’s market cap is equal to all Nasdaq-listed stocks in 2003. I don’t know if that’s adjusted for inflation, but it doesn’t matter. These tech stocks have broken all the rules we thought were possible. Companies this big shouldn’t have been able to grow this fast with such enormous pricing power and operating leverage.

Over the last decade, their revenue has compounded at 16% a year, while their free cash flow has grown at 13% a year.

The $11 trillion question is, are these stocks overrepresented in the index? Said differently, are they overvalued? Are they priced for lower returns going forward? This chart shows revenue and net income compared with market cap as a percent of the overall index.

They all have an outsized piece of the market cap compared with their revenue and net income. Clearly, there are other factors at play, like growth, margins, dominance, etc that have supported this being the case.

On both forward and trailing P/E’s, the top seven stocks appear to be trading at the upper end of their historical range. They have earned this premium multiple, but whether they can support it going forward is anyone’s guess.

If you got the big tech thesis right, you got the market right. And not just this year, but for the last decade. And if you thought these stocks were expensive in 2015, then it’s been a long and painful ride. Nobody knows what happens next, but the mega-cap stocks will be in the driver’s seat one way or another.

Josh and I were fortunate to talk about this and so much more with the legendary Jeremy Grantham on this week’s The Compound and Friends.

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.